Full Version: DxO Optics Pro
I see that this program has been reviewed with an update. It is, however, not up to date. IMO version 3.5 is a great improvement. Perhaps when you have the time you could take another look at it and give your readers the benefit of your impresssions.
QUOTE (Richard Grupe @ Feb 6 2006, 12:10 AM)
I see that this program has been reviewed with an update. It is, however, not up to date. IMO version 3.5 is a great improvement. Perhaps when you have the time you could take another look at it and give your readers the benefit of your impresssions.
Richard,Alain Briot has an article about DxO 3.5 here.
QUOTE (francois @ Feb 6 2006, 02:32 AM)
Thanks, I have read it and found it interesting. It was through a discussion about Alain's essay on another forum that led me to make this post, since others were linking to M.R.'s article.
QUOTE (Richard Grupe @ Feb 6 2006, 03:38 PM)
Thanks, I have read it and found it interesting. It was through a discussion about Alain's essay on another forum that led me to make this post, since others were linking to M.R.'s article.
Sorry,I should have guessed that your question originated from Alain's essay...
QUOTE (francois @ Feb 6 2006, 10:08 AM)
Sorry,
I should have guessed that your question originated from Alain's essay...
I should have guessed that your question originated from Alain's essay...
No problem!
I appreciated the reply.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.