The resolution is way, way, way, way, way too low.
The colour accuracy is way, way way, way, way, too bad.
This is a bad, bad, bad, bad idea.
Michael
photo-vinc
Jun 1 2006, 12:27 AM
QUOTE (michael @ Jun 1 2006, 01:24 AM)
The resolution is way, way, way, way, way too low.
The colour accuracy is way, way way, way, way, too bad.
This is a bad, bad, bad, bad idea.
Michael
Colour accuracy would be less a problem when making B&W prints I think. However the resolution is a "show stopper" (I could have calculated this by myself before asking here)
I tried it a long time ago when looking for some soft effects in BW. It worked for that, but further experiments "defocusing" my enlarger yielded better results and more control. So even when I was looking for fuzzygraphs, the enlarger worked better!
I once tried using a slide projector as an enlarger when I was a boy and couldn't afford the real thing. It was far too bright and had a long focal so I had to tape the paper to the wall acros the room for a 1 second exposure! even so the prints were all muddy.
with hindsight i should have made a black paper aperture for the front of the lens and tried to find a non-inflammable way to minimse light spill. Still the brightness saved on developer:)
the memory amuses me to this day. Mike
sniper
Sep 20 2007, 12:10 PM
It should be possible to "find" an old enlarger really cheap as everybody is switching, people are throwing them out (sadly) try your local photographic club or even your local photographic store, they may have some left they can't sell? woth a try. Wayne
Morgan_Moore
Sep 21 2007, 03:18 AM
QUOTE (sojournerphoto @ Sep 14 2007, 08:26 AM)
with hindsight i should have made a black paper aperture for the front of the lens and tried to find a non-inflammable way to minimse light spill. Still the brightness saved on developer:)
The theory works
My first enarger - a slide projector - I used a bottle top with a hole drilled in the middle as an aperture
My second a real enlarger I used a nikkor 24 to create large prints
All in mums bathroom of course - the carpet stills shows the damage 20 years later
S
rdonson
Sep 21 2007, 08:24 AM
QUOTE (Morgan_Moore @ Sep 21 2007, 04:18 AM)
The theory works
My first enarger - a slide projector - I used a bottle top with a hole drilled in the middle as an aperture
My second a real enlarger I used a nikkor 24 to create large prints
All in mums bathroom of course - the carpet stills shows the damage 20 years later S
My first enlarger was a slide projector as well. My brother and I made numerous modifications and were quite pleased with the results as we had no money to speak of. After that it was Omega enlargers and finally Beselers until I went digital.
While I have fond memories of that slide projector and what we were able to accomplish I'm sure glad I no longer have to work in my parents' basement.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.