QUOTE (hgtan @ Dec 26 2006, 02:40 PM)
I have done a close comparison between the original RAW image and converted JPEG image and I can not find any differences. Of course the JPEG file (14M) is actually bigger than the RAW file (12M) as I have done a simple direct conversion.
The Canon converter is designed to duplicate the Canon in-camera JPEG processing, so you're not going to find much in the way of difference there. It's a design choice. If you use a third-party RAW converter like ACR, theimage straight from the converter will be softer than the Canon converter initially, but once you apply some sharpening tools in Photoshop, you can get a result that is superior to any Canon converter. ACR, when properly calibrated, will also give you more accurate color than the Canon stuff, and you have CA correction and tonality curve adjustments available as well.