From reading the specs on the Canon site, it appears that the 1D MK III also lacks DEP. Canon first abandoned DEP with the 1Ds Mk II (it was on the Mk I).
I keep hoping that they will restore this feature, as it set Canon apart from all camera manufacturers for the last 20 years. DEP was an easy way to hyperfocus -- a critical feature for landscape photographers. (Unless you want to carry around depth of field tables, and you think you can accurately judge distances within the range of one or two feet.)
Of course, there is little hope that DEP will be restored, when Michael Reichmann has consistently applauded each of the new Canon cameras that dropped this feature, and doesn't even mention that Canon dropped DEP in his reviews.
Michael is on record as applauding this feature, just read this:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dep.shtml
But now the absence of DEP isn't even mentioned in his reviews.
Of course, Michael also has, at times, argued that Canon and Japanese manufacturers don't listen to input from reviewers. But his latest review pretty well puts that myth to rest, when he finishes by saying :
Canon -- please make note that I will be leaving for a 10 day shoot in Madagascar on October 20th. A review sample of the 1Ds MKIII by that date would really be appreciated, both by me and about a million readers each month :-)
Either that, or you'll end up with a review featuring more photographs of my dog. The choice is yours.
Michael, why not use that market clout to push Canon to restore DEP, since you know how important it can be for landscape photographers?
If you, the editor and publisher of a web site devoted to landscape photography, won't at least criticize Canon for dropping the feature, then why do you even bother to keep the above metnioned review of DEP on your own web site?
