Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: I need new mid-range zoom lens
Luminous Landscape Forum > Equipment & Techniques > Cameras, Lenses and Shooting gear
henkelphoto
Hi guys!

I'm looking for a new mid-range zoom lens. I've got a D70 right now and intend to buy a D300 by summer and am trying to find something to replace the crap Sigma 28-105 lens I now have. I'm planning on buying the Nikon 24-70 2.8, but if I can find a good third-party lens I could save some money. Do any of you know of a 24-70 or 28-70 2.8 lens made by Tokina, Tamron or Sigma that has equivelant quality of the Nikon? I still have film cameras that I use so am more interested in an FX lens than a DX lens.

Thanks!

Jerry
Tony Sx
QUOTE (henkelphoto @ Jan 30 2008, 10:03 PM)
Hi guys!

I'm looking for a new mid-range zoom lens. I've got a D70 right now and intend to buy a D300 by summer and am trying to find something to replace the crap Sigma 28-105 lens I now have. I'm planning on buying the Nikon 24-70 2.8, but if I can find a good third-party lens I could save some money. Do any of you know of a 24-70 or 28-70 2.8 lens made by Tokina, Tamron or Sigma that has equivelant quality of the Nikon? I still have film cameras that I use so am more interested in an FX lens than a DX lens.

Thanks!

Jerry
*


Have you tried Fred Miranda ?
the 'reviews' are by individuals and so can't really be accused of too much bias.
there are reviews of Canon, Nikon, Sigma, Tamron and Tokina lenses so you can at least compare scores....
NashvilleMike
Unfortunately you used the key phrase "equivalent quality" in your question, so my answer is "no".

I own the 24-70/2.8 Nikkor and my opinion is that it is without any question one of the finest mid range zooms made (by anyone) and I'm quite particular about image quality. Both the objective and subjective reviewers who have reviewed it so far have given it very high praise.

This does not mean you can't "get by" with a cheaper 3rd party alternative, but it's not going to be the same.

At the end of the day it comes down to your budget and philosophy. My approach to lens purchases is that I'd rather buy the best glass I can afford, one time, instead of getting into a cycle of buy/sell/trade.

Excellent glass is a good investment in that you won't generally be replacing it as often as the nice shiny new DSLR temptresses, er, bodies that come out every year or two smile.gif

However, the decision is a personal one. The lens is rather rare at the moment, but perhaps you can borrow one from a friend or rent one once they become more available and make your own decision. I'd make the comparisons on a D300 body if I could - the higher resolution body will both stress and show off the lens quality more than the D70 would.

Hope this helps.

-mike
DarkPenguin
QUOTE (henkelphoto @ Jan 30 2008, 04:03 PM)
Hi guys!

I'm looking for a new mid-range zoom lens. I've got a D70 right now and intend to buy a D300 by summer and am trying to find something to replace the crap Sigma 28-105 lens I now have. I'm planning on buying the Nikon 24-70 2.8, but if I can find a good third-party lens I could save some money. Do any of you know of a 24-70 or 28-70 2.8 lens made by Tokina, Tamron or Sigma that has equivelant quality of the Nikon? I still have film cameras that I use so am more interested in an FX lens than a DX lens.

Thanks!

Jerry
*


Tamron 28-75 is about as good as you'll get without buying the real thing.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.