I always find some difficulty in settling upon categories when organising my photos. You know; waterfalls, wildlife, cityscapes, portraits, nudes etc etc.

When recently processing a few landscapes, the term phallic symbolism sprung to mind. What do you think? Appropriate? Or would you think 'roots and rocks' would be better?

Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment

Hmmm...thought you would have gotten some answers by now. You've really given us a hard one here.

Is this a real question or are you just dicking around?

First the Thai lady boys and now this. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

Ray, just curious if you used a tripod or not. You'd think it would be the opposite but I find with these kinds of subjects my compositions usually turn out kind of stiff if I hand-hold.

I think the Kodachrome Basin is at least as phallic as the Far East:

Is this going to become another 'mine's bigger than yours' thread ??

Ray, what were you taking pictures of?

Don't forget Ka-ule-o-Nãnãhoa, on the island of Moloka'i, a legendary fertility stone...

http://www.photographersdirect.com/buyers/...imageid=1365972

Rock formations and tree roots. Oh! You mean the location.

The first two from the left were taken on the island of Koh Samui in Thailand. Unfortunately, the lighting wasn't too good. The others are all of the ruins of Ta Prohm in the Angkor Wat vicinity.

Not necessarily! Panopeeper's rock formation has the advantage of much more interesting lighting, but have you got a rock formation like this, Gabor?

Click to view attachment

LOL, that's good too!

The Kodachrome Basin is a horny area:

http://www.panopeeper.com/USA/KodachromeBasin/20D20406.jpg

http://www.panopeeper.com/USA/KodachromeBasin/20D20407.jpg

Is this topic "Members Only"?

No, I think Ray's last shot is more miss than member.

Then that must be the category.

For cross reference purposes, Gordon. One simple category is often not sufficient to find quickly the precise image one is searching for.

But I understand what you mean. I'm not particularly serious with this question .

Phile under Phallus...
ouch!
Click to view attachment
(Hampi,India,Lumix LX2)

That guy do circumcisions ?