QUOTE (schaubild @ Apr 5 2008, 01:59 PM)
I'm not so sure if you can compare the Max and the RS so easily.
At the first look maybe similar concepts, but when you go into the details, these cameras are quite different beasts.
The Alpa is heavier, bigger and more solidly built. Like on the XY all rails are integrated in the camera housing.
The shift rails on the Cambo move outside of the camera outline, which shortens the mounting base when shifting. Some of the Rodenstock HR lenses are quite heavy, combined with a digital back this could become problematic. It has to be seen if this has any impact on the stability and precision and therefore achievable image quality. That the shift rails are mounted stacked on the back could be a possible source of problems too, imprecisions would add up?
Comparisons based on weight don't seem a feasible method to imply on a camera's qualities. You wouldn't do such a comparison betwween a Schneider Digitar 24mm (305gr) and the Rodenstock HR 28mm (876gr), wouldn't you?
Some cameras can be too small and/or light too. Figures don't tell everything, what counts is the end result.
Both cameras are prototypes now, both will be released to the public in a few months. Then will be the time to really find out if a direct comparison makes sense at all.
Just my 5 cents.
schaubild
I agree with your observations about the Max and the RS, they are different beasts. Not having used an Alpa, I have always admired the simplicity and beauty of the Alpa SWA.
The Cambo RS has more similarities to the Horseman digital body with regards to size and performance...........it is a small technical camera with selflocking geared movements (Horseman had a friction with lock movement)
Like you, I was concerned about the small size and its ramifications with regard to precision.
After having used a preproduction RS for the last couple of months, I see no difference between
the RS and its sibling the CamboWide DS......... both cameras are precise enough for making photographs.
In addition to being a smaller sized camera, the RS has both the rise/fall and shift movements consolidated on one rear moving panel that holds the sensor or ground glass........if you do multirow stitches the vanishing point is held constant since the lens panel is fixed ( this feature of the consolidated movements may or may not be critical depending on your choice of stitching softwares).
The geared movements are selflocking and do not drift or move unless you touch the control mechanism. It is a nicely designed and manufactured camera..........the handles and the body
are anodized aluminum.
All the lens panels are interchangeable between the DS and the RS......
because of the condensed size, the RS has two levers instead of one to hold/release the lens panel.
It is a very straight forward and robust design that will allow you to work efficiently under many different shooting environments. I particularly like the lens guards which allow you to put the camera down securely as well as pack it in a back pack or soft case.
The only optional accessories you might want to purchase: view finder for quick rough composing or handheld shootings, and a groundglass & focusing hood for critical composing. You simply specify the mounting interface plate (I think it is included with the camera) and you are ready to shoot.
The integration of the AFI/Hy6 lenses and the Hy6 rotating adapter are interesting as well.
The only thing that is on my wish list is a technical camera with a sliding back to make composing and shooting a more fluid process
regards