QUOTE(Conner999 @ Jun 4 2008, 08:02 AM)
Nice shot (as he sits smoking a cigar with his 2nd coffee of morning). How do you like the 35-70 - am seriously considering it for my 1Ds2 (long time Leica/CZ shooter on EoS)?
Just want to give you a short answer here. I have owned a Canon 24-70, 24-105, leica 35-70 and Zeiss 35-70.
Let me say the following: The Canon has autofocus, which is not bad, if you need it. The IS of the 24-105 is amazing and I sometimes still use it. On my 1DsMk2 I went with the 24-10, why ? Because the IS is really good and the image quality was quite, good. The 24-70, is in my eyes not really better and is lacking the IS.
I started with the Canon on my 1DsMk3 and I have to admit I was shocked. It looked like crap. So I got my old 24-70 out and tried it again, well a littlbe better, but still looked ugly especially the edges are horrible.
I than bought the Leica and Zeiss. Both are really amazing, I mean there is a world of differences between these two lenses and the Canon crap. (sry ^^ but it is as it is)
Just for pure Image quality, the Zeiss has the edge, it is a little sharper. But there is a big BUT, when it comes to handling the Leica wins hands down. The main let down on the Zeiss is that it still is a push and pull zoom. To sum it up both the Leica and the zeiss are much better than anything Canon produces right now.
One final word. I know some people will start screaming, how I can test a 24-70 to a 35-70 lens. Well I did not. I tested both zoom lenses against Canon primes I used before I switched to the Leica zoom. (35 f1.4L;50 macro;85 f1.8) Sorry but after doing a lot of testing I have to say, there is no need for Canon primes. Isn't it sad that they are not better than a Leica zoom ? Well that's how it is. I don't think we have to argue on how much the Canon primes are compared to Canon zooms ^^
if you have further questions you can write me a mail or PM.
EDIT: I hope it's readable ^^ was too late when I wrote this stuff.