Help - Search - Member List - Calendar
Full Version: Recent Works
Luminous Landscape Forum > Equipment & Techniques > Digital Cameras, Backs and Shooting Techniques
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
wolfnowl
QUOTE(juicy @ May 25 2008, 02:06 PM)
Peace.
*



Interesting choice of title. To me she seems pensive, as if waiting for someone to come home...

Mike.
Christopher
Just shot it today.

Canon 1Dsmk3
35-70 Leica lens

user posted image

DarkPenguin
God, I miss smoking.
Geoff Wittig
QUOTE(DarkPenguin @ May 27 2008, 05:20 PM)
God, I miss smoking.
*




Maybe this'll help:
I'm a family doctor in a small town. In my little practice in the last two months I've diagnosed four more patients with advanced lung cancer. Every single one of them is going to die from their disease. Think chest pain, coughing up blood, and slowly suffocating to death. I know, the whole lung cancer/heart attack thing is abstract while that cigarette is concrete and right here & now. But miserable death from cigarettes is a concrete, here & now reality for me every freakin' day.
Heroin is safer. Seriously.
mrleonard
QUOTE(Geoff Wittig @ May 28 2008, 09:42 PM)
Maybe this'll help:
I'm a family doctor in a small town. In my little practice in the last two months I've diagnosed four more patients with advanced lung cancer. Every single one of them is going to die from their disease. Think chest pain, coughing up blood, and slowly suffocating to death. I know, the whole lung cancer/heart attack thing is abstract while that cigarettet is concrete and right here & now. But miserable death from cigarettes is a concrete, here & now reality for me every freakin' day.
Heroin is safer. Seriously.
*



My father in law died of ung cancer...terrible disease! Never smoked a cigarette in his life though....
You could die tomorrow in agonising pain a million different ways and those car keys in your hand are probably worse than your pack a day monkey.
Smoke ,drink and live it up..just keep shooting!
dwdallam
QUOTE(Geoff Wittig @ May 29 2008, 02:42 AM)
Heroin is safer. Seriously.
*




Vicoden is a really good thing right before really stressful shoot, like the one I did yesterday. It allows you to think without that nagging freak-out feeling flowing through your veins, preventing you from thinking slowly, methodically, without going into instinct mode. I hate that.

So anyway I got a call from a group of Fire Dancers that needed some promotional shots. They live in my area and I shot them once before, but as an event photographer. They liked the images, and decided to call me--three hours before they wanted to shoot!

I shot three people each in as much as ten different poses using all the light angles I had. It was way, way too much for one shoot, but I think I got a few keepers. Next time it's going to be a much more planned operation.

here are some quick grabs from the camera with some fast cropping on a couple of the images. And now I have to get to work processing.
juicy
QUOTE(wolfnowl @ May 26 2008, 01:09 AM)
Interesting choice of title.  To me she seems pensive, as if waiting  for someone to come home...

Mike.
*



Hi!

The image is a snapshot taken late in the evening (1/6s, f2.8 iso 1250). For myself it communicates the feeling of totally relaxed atmosphere with the only sound being a nightingale (and unfortunately the shutter). However, people who were not present at the time of the shot will most probably see the image differently.
But to be accurate I must say that the word "peace" was not meant as the title of the shot but more of a greeting to the forum while at the same time trying to communicate my own emotion associated with the image. Thanks for your thought provoking comment.

Cheers,
J
Ray
Beware of river banks when you visit Australia.

[attachmentid=6889]
Ray
Tread carefully!

[attachmentid=6890]

tcphoto
Three images from my rooftop stitched together.
Chris_Brown
QUOTE(Ray @ Jun 3 2008, 06:51 AM)
Tread carefully!

[attachmentid=6890]
*


It's the smile that'll kill me.
Conner999
Nice shot (as he sits smoking a cigar with his 2nd coffee of morning). How do you like the 35-70 - am seriously considering it for my 1Ds2 (long time Leica/CZ shooter on EoS)?




QUOTE(Christopher @ May 27 2008, 12:19 PM)
Just shot it today.

Canon 1Dsmk3
35-70 Leica lens

user posted image
*


Christopher
QUOTE(Conner999 @ Jun 4 2008, 08:02 AM)
Nice shot (as he sits smoking a cigar with his 2nd coffee of morning). How do you like the 35-70 - am seriously considering it for my 1Ds2 (long time Leica/CZ shooter on EoS)?
*



Just want to give you a short answer here. I have owned a Canon 24-70, 24-105, leica 35-70 and Zeiss 35-70.

Let me say the following: The Canon has autofocus, which is not bad, if you need it. The IS of the 24-105 is amazing and I sometimes still use it. On my 1DsMk2 I went with the 24-10, why ? Because the IS is really good and the image quality was quite, good. The 24-70, is in my eyes not really better and is lacking the IS.

I started with the Canon on my 1DsMk3 and I have to admit I was shocked. It looked like crap. So I got my old 24-70 out and tried it again, well a littlbe better, but still looked ugly especially the edges are horrible.

I than bought the Leica and Zeiss. Both are really amazing, I mean there is a world of differences between these two lenses and the Canon crap. (sry ^^ but it is as it is)
Just for pure Image quality, the Zeiss has the edge, it is a little sharper. But there is a big BUT, when it comes to handling the Leica wins hands down. The main let down on the Zeiss is that it still is a push and pull zoom. To sum it up both the Leica and the zeiss are much better than anything Canon produces right now.

One final word. I know some people will start screaming, how I can test a 24-70 to a 35-70 lens. Well I did not. I tested both zoom lenses against Canon primes I used before I switched to the Leica zoom. (35 f1.4L;50 macro;85 f1.8) Sorry but after doing a lot of testing I have to say, there is no need for Canon primes. Isn't it sad that they are not better than a Leica zoom ? Well that's how it is. I don't think we have to argue on how much the Canon primes are compared to Canon zooms ^^

if you have further questions you can write me a mail or PM.

EDIT: I hope it's readable ^^ was too late when I wrote this stuff.
Conner999
Excellent. Thanks for the candor. I'm sure they'll be some forthcoming flack

I almost exclusively use Leica and to a slightly less degree CZ/Hassy on my 1Ds2 and while I own/have owned & used a LOT of Leica primes, I've never used a 35-70/4 and am interested in one.

As you know, once you've used Leica or CZ or some Hassy/Zeiss (110/2 F) on a FF Canon, going back to EF glass (with some exceptions - e.g. 35/1.4, 85/1.2 V2, 135/2) feels like a BIG downgrade. Canon's long & fast sports glass (300/2.8 IS and up) is a different matter - much closer (with the exception of APO glass) contest.

The CZ and Leica draw differently, but vs. EF "L" (what a farce) glass, they are sharper, deliver better color, are MUCH better built, have no QC issues (other than odd stiff focus ring in neglected glass), were designed for manual focus -- and they feel like they're worth the $$ you paid.

Leica have their issues, but damn, they know how to make and test (PRIOR to shipment) lenses. CZ glass is no slouch and are some of the best bargains in glass these days, but you have to be a bit pickier on what lenses.

Thanks again.

BTW - saw your web site, nice work.
smthopr
recent work?

Canon 5d, 50mm f1.4 prime at f22 1/400 sec, ISO 200.

This is a photograph in the late afternoon looking towards the (unseen) Black Sea, north of Batumi, Republic of Georgia.

I am finding the for the most part, my non-"L" primes are sharper than the 5d can capture so I'm not yet tempted to get a Lieca or Ziess lens yet...
smthopr
One more from Batumi, Georgia....

50mm lens, f4.5
smthopr
and one more from Tbilisi with the 24mm 2.8 lens....and Canon 5D
Conner999
Bruce - very nice.
tcphoto
My latest Promo Piece.
dwdallam
QUOTE(tcphoto @ Jun 5 2008, 11:18 PM)
My latest Promo Piece.
*




Nice, but watch the shadow on the left, inside of the plate. I found those finger looking shadows a little distracting.

Also, I may be mistaken, but I think I see two light sources: The shadows on the left inside of the plate and a very light shadow on the right inside of the plate. That makes it look like light is coming from two directions. Am I right?

If we had two suns each casting its own shadow, lighting with only one shadow direction (from one source) would look strange to us? That's always been a very interesting philosophical concept for me.
tcphoto
QUOTE(dwdallam @ Jun 5 2008, 10:36 PM)
Nice, but watch the shadow on the left, inside of the plate. I found those finger looking shadows a little distracting.

Also, I may be mistaken, but I think I see two light sources: The shadows on the left inside of the plate and a very light shadow on the right inside of the plate. That makes it look like light is coming from two directions. Am I right?

If we had two suns each casting its own shadow, lighting with only one shadow direction (from one source) would look strange to us? That's always been a very interesting philosophical concept for me.
*



It was open shade and a piece of foamcore for fill.
Giedo
20D, 300 mm f2.8 & 1.4 TC. Location: Hidden Valley, Serengeti, Tanzania
Josh-H
QUOTE(Giedo @ Jun 6 2008, 07:05 PM)
20D, 300 mm f2.8 & 1.4 TC. Location: Hidden Valley, Serengeti, Tanzania
*



Lovely.
telyt

user posted image
Acorn Woodpecker

Leica R8/DMR, 560mm f/6.8 Telyt-R, shoulder stock & monopod
Sacramento County California

Doug Herr
Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
dwdallam
QUOTE(tcphoto @ Jun 6 2008, 07:54 AM)
It was open shade and a piece of foamcore for fill.
*



Hmmm. Strange you got those shadows then. It should have been virtually a flat light, like you want for that sort of subject. But there had to be direction or you would not have needed a fill, right? You didn't use any artificial lighting?
dwdallam
QUOTE(Giedo @ Jun 6 2008, 09:05 AM)
20D, 300 mm f2.8 & 1.4 TC. Location: Hidden Valley, Serengeti, Tanzania
*



Yeah this is quite nice.
dwdallam
QUOTE(telyt @ Jun 7 2008, 04:18 AM)

user posted image
Acorn Woodpecker

Leica R8/DMR, 560mm f/6.8 Telyt-R, shoulder stock & monopod
Sacramento County California

Doug Herr
Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
*




Yep, very nice.
tompappas
here is one from a few days ago

cheers

tom




[attachmentid=7017]
DonWeston
QUOTE(tompappas @ Jun 12 2008, 02:54 PM)
here is one from a few days ago

cheers 

tom
[attachmentid=7017]
*




Beautiful work Doug and Tom, love the color and contrast in the woodpecker shot and the sepia tonality of the watering can, really well done. Here is one of mine shot last weekend with my new toy D60 and 55-200mmVR
tompappas
QUOTE(DonWeston @ Jun 12 2008, 03:01 PM)
Beautiful work Doug and Tom, love the color and contrast in the woodpecker shot and the sepia tonality of the watering can, really well done. Here is one of mine shot last weekend with my new toy D60 and 55-200mmVR
*



Don

Thanx for the kind words...

you got yourself some nice light in yours

t


DonWeston
QUOTE(tompappas @ Jun 12 2008, 03:36 PM)
Don

Thanx for the kind words...

you got yourself some nice light in yours

t
*




Tom - and thanks back at you, I love to go out and shoot flowers after a rain or just in overcast weather while most everyone goes on to other things....
KevinA
QUOTE(DonWeston @ Jun 12 2008, 08:02 PM)
Tom - and thanks back at you, I love to go out and shoot flowers after a rain or just in overcast weather while most everyone goes on to other things....
*



Not shure a Sony Erikson comes under 35mm, but oh well.
As science marches on and the male roll becomes less defined and some would say redundant. There is evidence of a back lash to this developing situation, no more will the male of the species be the robotic obedient servant, seduced by the carrot on the stick of clean shirts food and sex.
The writing is on the wall.
http://homepage.mac.com/kevin_allen/Future/PhotoAlbum16.html

Kevin.
tompappas
another new one from last tuesday

cheers


tom



[attachmentid=7158]
semillerimages
Conner,

What adapter are you using for the hassy glass on the canon and where did you get it?

Thank you,

*steve

QUOTE(Conner999 @ Jun 5 2008, 12:09 AM)
Excellent. Thanks for the candor. I'm sure they'll be some forthcoming flack

I almost exclusively use Leica and to a slightly less degree CZ/Hassy on my 1Ds2 and while I own/have owned & used a LOT of Leica  primes,  I've never used a 35-70/4 and am interested in one. 

As you know, once you've used Leica or CZ or some Hassy/Zeiss (110/2 F) on a FF Canon, going back to EF glass (with some exceptions - e.g. 35/1.4, 85/1.2 V2, 135/2) feels like a BIG downgrade. Canon's long & fast sports glass (300/2.8 IS and up) is a different matter - much closer (with the exception of APO glass) contest.

The CZ and Leica draw differently, but vs. EF "L" (what a farce) glass, they are sharper, deliver better color, are MUCH better built, have no QC issues (other than odd stiff focus ring in neglected glass), were designed for manual focus -- and they feel like they're worth the $$ you paid.

Leica have their issues, but damn, they know how to make and test (PRIOR to shipment) lenses. CZ glass is no slouch and are some of the best bargains in glass these days, but you have to be a bit pickier on what lenses.

Thanks again.

BTW - saw your web site, nice work.
*


Lightbox
Its been a pretty wet start to winter in New Zealand, two heavy storms passed recently -


user posted image


.
EricM
I wouldn't mind some nice photogenic storms like those. Nice images!

-Eric
thewanderer
QUOTE(Giedo @ Jun 6 2008, 09:05 AM)
20D, 300 mm f2.8 & 1.4 TC. Location: Hidden Valley, Serengeti, Tanzania
*






this is really nice, all the background animals in the different levels of clarity
Derryck
Didn't have much of a background to work with at the Beijing Race Track but I think that the sun reflecting off the surface of the road helped as well as a little burning in at the top of the frame. 5D with 24-70.
Er1kksen
A gloomy day on the beach:
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Olympus E-330, 14-45mm kit lens, really hoping to upgrade that lens soon...
dwdallam
QUOTE(Lightbox @ Jun 22 2008, 11:47 AM)
Its been a pretty wet start to winter in New Zealand, two heavy storms passed recently -

.
*



That image on the left is wonderful.
dwdallam
QUOTE(MichaelEzra @ Apr 3 2008, 04:11 PM)
Great Sand Dunes, Colorado 2006. 160 megapixels (you can count needles of that far away tree:) )
Fuji S3

user posted image
*



I may have commented on this before, but I was looking through this thread again, and just wanted to say that this images keeps me looking at it uh, forever. Great job.
dwdallam
I was in San Francisco last week. I don't think I got anything landscape worthy, and once again, I fell into shooting people.

I'll post more when I get time.

This particular image is of a young friend who is attending an art school in Sacramento for movie production. She agreed to be my grip and do all the navigating around San Francisco--which I was completely clueless about--as long as I paid for everything. Deal!

She was a great grip and even greater navigator and tour guide.

Anyway, I was waiting for a cable car to get back to it's turnabout around 12PM and got bored, so I shot Dottie under a street lamp as we waited, left image. Fisherman's Wharf.
f2.8 @ 1/20th, ISO 1600: 70mm hand held with a 24-70L.


This second shot was done with one Alien Bees 800 and a Photoflex Qsoftbox for a portfolio. Kirsten.
mcfoto
Montalbetti+Campbell using CANON EOS-1 Ds MkIII

[attachmentid=7208]
[attachmentid=7209]
dwdallam
Just had enough time to do a quick resize and some fast ACR on this file from my trip to San Francisco. It was a one shot no repeat, and it may be the best of this view I got, which isn't saying much, however. After all, when you shoot the Golden Gate, you better have a REALLY good shot, since every photographer out there has shot it.

EricM
That's pretty nice, IMHO, dwdallam.
ihv
Hi Denis, the first one is my favorite, I like it very much!

QUOTE(mcfoto @ Jun 25 2008, 09:29 AM)
Montalbetti+Campbell using CANON EOS-1 Ds MkIII

[attachmentid=7208]
[attachmentid=7209]
*


dwdallam
QUOTE(EricM @ Jun 25 2008, 12:58 PM)
That's pretty nice, IMHO, dwdallam.
*




Thanks, which one?
EricM
QUOTE(dwdallam @ Jun 26 2008, 02:15 AM)
Thanks, which one?
*


I was referring to the bridge shot, which is quite different from the usual cliche of the GG bridge.

Of course, my alltime favorite GG photo is Ansel's one of the "Golden Gate Before the Bridge." smile.gif

-Eric
dwdallam
QUOTE(EricM @ Jun 26 2008, 01:03 PM)
I was referring to the bridge shot, which is quite different from the usual cliche of the GG bridge.

Of course, my alltime favorite GG photo is Ansel's one of the "Golden Gate Before the Bridge."  smile.gif

-Eric
*




That's a good point. Too much sky for my taste, w/o better cloud cover, but now that you have mentioned the perspective, as did one of my friends, I think I'll try to perfect it next time I go. Thanks for the comment.
Derryck
Shot a couple of days ago in the studio. To advertise chocolate mooncakes for a local restaurant. 1Ds III with 90mm TS lit with single Profoto head through a roll of 216 Lee diffusion.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.