Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Panoramas
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques
Snow Guy
Hi, this is my first time here and I am interested about photo critques. I am somewhat new at this.
wolfnowl
Hi There, and welcome to the list!

These are certainly panoramas of mountains... what is it your images are trying to say?

Mike.
Snow Guy
I think the topic of the pictures are saying how vast the mountains are.
Geoff Wittig
QUOTE (Snow Guy @ Apr 18 2008, 08:22 PM)
Hi, this is my first time here and I am interested about photo critques. I am somewhat new at this.
*



Technically good images that are lacking something compositionally. The image on the left—Mt. Baker?—is nicely exposed and looks sharp, but I find myself really wanting to see what's going on in the foreground just below the image. It's frustrating, like looking out a window that's just a little too high.
The right hand image shows some pleasant snow and trees, but there's no compositional organization to it; really just a panoramic snapshot.

Panoramic images have their own internal logic and æsthetic. They have the potential to show what it really feels like to stand in a certain place at a certain time and look out at the world. But to achieve this they generally need some kind of foreground detail to anchor the image and provide a sense of depth. It also helps to think through how much "stuff" to include at each end, to make a visually satisfying arrangement. At least that's been the case with panoramics I've tried.
Snow Guy
The first one was Mt Rainier. I tried to crop it a little but had to end up makeing less long tell me if it improved.
Geoff Wittig
QUOTE (Snow Guy @ Apr 18 2008, 11:13 PM)
The first one was Mt Rainier. I tried to crop it a little but had to end up makeing less long tell me if it improved.
*



It's a technically competent image. But it doesn't really convey what it feels like to be looking out at this awesome mountain; instead it looks like a painted movie backdrop, because of the lack of depth cues in the foreground. Undoing the cropping doesn't change this very much; everything going on in the image is obviously a long distance away.

Of course, this is just me talking; I have no special artistic training or expertise. But for my own panos, I have found that they consistently have far more presence and impact when there's some detail in the foreground (like a gnarled photogenic tree or some flowers) to provide a visual indication of three-dimensional depth.

Like so:
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.