Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Hasselblad 40mm C distagon and digital back
Luminous Landscape Forum > Equipment & Techniques > Medium Format Digital Backs and Photography
buzzski
Hello all, I recently posted asking your thoughts and experiences between a Blad SWC and 40mm distagon. I opted for the 40mm option and picked up a C version second hand for a very reasonable price. I've not exhaustively tested the lens as yet but from the quick shot that I have done I am delighted to say that the image quality is very good. I was concerned about distortion but I'm using an Aptus 17 and I cannot see any evidence of it at all, my test was nice and plumb and sharp out to the corners. I must admit, it is a beast of a lens to hand-hold but mounted on a pod it seems fine, maybe a bit front heavy but otherwise real nice. I have noticed that off the camera, the focussing is nice and smooth through the entire range but once mounted it is a bit stiffer, due to the weight of the front of the lens. Has anyone else picked up on this and if so is it a common fault or indeed do you know of a way to deal with it? It isn't a big deal at all but if anyone can advise I'd be much obliged. Thanks, Craig
rhsu
I'm new here looking for something else (Schneider 35xl and 47xl) and saw this post - so thought quickly reply. I used the CFE-FLE-40mm (non-IF version) on my 503CW w/ V96C (assuming your back would be similiar 16mp square format)INSTEAD of the CF version because according to the MTF and worldwide users, CFE renders a MUCH better results than the CF (albeit the softness that you see in your images) and CFE-IF - probably with film users rather than digital and film DO NOT seat flat like digital sensor does so it is a very concluding fact albeit why I got the CFE. It is bloody sharp because you are ONLY using the "sweet spot" of the lens which is at its sharpest! (CFE-IF has "more" distortion than the CFE-FLE version - by adding the IF may have produced the effect.) Like to see the lens against a full-frame sensor - that would be on a 22mp/39mp - and see the edges and fall out. In terms of the focusing ring, its because it is close to the camera body that you don't get a good grip. I haven't notice it when I owned one (sell on shelve for sale - in Aust, no one shoots MF anymore let alone acquiring special lens like this) but with 20/20 hindsight, in comparison to my CFE 80mm, you are right that the 40mm is a bit tight. But when compared with the CFE 180, I dare say it is on par with your 40mm experience... so must be the weight of the glasses (it's a heavy piece of lens)!
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.