At first glance I assumed that the NEC 2690 is a higher quality graphics monitor since it is called a "spectraview" monitor and the 3090 is not. Some of you own both, so what is your opinion?
The specs on the 3090 appear to be superior -- 97.8% aRGB coverage for the 3090 versus 93% for the 2690. The 3090 has .25 dot pitch, and the 2690 has .287. The image formation time is 12 ms for the 3090 versus 16 ms for the 2690. (Not that these specs mean anything. Those of you have actually used or seen both side by side could really comment on the difference.)
One point is not clear. The 2690, like the Eizos, calibrates the monitor itself using the specrtraview software, rather than calibrating the video card.
But the literature is not clear if the same is true for the 3090. Does the software calibrate the 3090 monitor directly? If not, how critical is that?
I own a DTP 94 as well at the Gregtag device that comes with the HP APS. I assume that both work just fine with the NEC software, so all I have to order is the software?
Finally, I am a little confused by DVI-D versus DVI-I conections. Does anyone know what type of connection is on a NVIDIA 8800 video card? I know it can handle dual link for the higher resolution But I need to order a longer cable. I'm assuming that what I need is a longer DVI-D to DVI-D cable -- not a DVI-I cable. Corrrect?
