[quote=neil snape,Sep 16 2008, 09:18 AM]
[quote=Ernst Dinkla,Sep 15 2008, 10:27 AM]
There are gaps in HP's product line that could be filled with Z3100, Z6100, B9180 technology and improvements upon them like an even wider gamut ink. The Z3100 isn't overshadowed by its competitors yet.
A 17" with precise sheet feeding, building on B9180 technology and a Z3100 or improved upon inkset. A 60" with Z3100 inkset and Z6100 heads. Then another year to replace the 24" and 44" Z3100/Z2100 with faster models = Z6100 heads. Some paper transport issues/limitations fixed in them too.
For most of us it is still a guess ten days before the Photokina.
Ernst Dinkla
With the bronzing of the 9180 and gloss diff, the HP pigments today do not make a top line B&W on photo media without the use of gloss enhancer. Colour is acceptable, but on par with UC not K3 Epson, nor Canon x100 series inks.
So either they make the inks much better avoiding GE (GE has it's own problems/disadvantages) or they will loose their entry into pigments photo printers.
They need vacuum feed and thick paper support in the Z, take up spools, software driver updates that actually work, and greatly improve the QA.
I would bet on certain things listed above , others we'll see.
Like I said surprise us and we'll be delighted.
Yesterday, another rattle your bones news on the stock market, brought a note on Cramer's reports that HP will let go 25000 people. Hope they are not in the printer divisions.
[/quote]
Neil,
That's more or less the route I was thinking of too. Whether they should drop GE in that process is something I'm not so sure about but it allows another channel for an extra hue :-) You once mentioned that HP had some new color technology up their sleeves, could be the time to introduce that too.
The paper transport limitations exist and can be solved with new designs but it would be quite a design change and I will be surprised when they introduce them with successors of the Z3100/Z2100 on this Photokina, within two years after the first Z model introduction. The real competition that started two years ago may however require faster model changes.
With software I'm a bit conservative. Used to its flaws right now and more afraid of what it could become next time :-) The underlying software technology isn't the real problem: color management is alright, the extrapolation, dithering, weaving alright, printer maintenance aspects alright. All what is laid on top of that like the interfacing with other applications is what creates my headaches. A banner mode for roll paper is what I really miss. Part of the trouble is the hermetic control HP likes to have on the communications between the printer, the driver (and HP itself). Something of that is reflected in its websites too. I think it would need a small revolution in the HP R&D departments before that is changed. There was talk on Slashdot that HP might bring its own OS system one day (Linux related of course). Wonder what that would look like.
It seems HP cuts jobs in the US mainly and not graphic arts related ones. Former EDS staff will be sacked the BBC says. The people they intended to use in the technology service market versus IBM. The next ten year (US) economy forecast has changed over the last year and is changing every minute now, to put it mildly. HP's revenue is already 2/3 from outside the US. Their global graphic arts market strategy seems to work very well.
Ernst Dinkla
Try:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wide_Inkjet_Printers/