Michael,

You use to label your home page images with the camera and lens used to photograph it. I know you probably had a good reason to remove it but maybe a hint would be nice

Thanks

JT

Just bringing this to the top in case it was buried in threads.

Just guessing, but some of the recent images are a bit of an historical retrospective. Might have been shot with film, with no digital metadata available.

Why it is important to you that these infos are now missing jtorral? I didnt even notice.

I notice.

And for me is to satisfy my curiosity and for learning. I think one can learn from that kind of information. For the artistic enjoyment it may appear as irrelevant, but I enjoy more if I know the technical details.

Anyway, White Sands Moonrise technical details are: Pentax 67II and 55~100mm f/4.5 zoom. Provia 100F

How I know? Just go to 'Locations' and find White Sands National Monument .

There you can find much more information.

Manuel

In my case, its just curiosity. I'm interested in seeing what Michael is shooting with currently.

Pentax 67!

NOW you know why the horizon 'appears' tilted; at least, you do if you ever used one of those things. Nothing to do with French bubbles at all.

Rob C

just curious.

In the past, a photo without attribution to the camera and lens is usually an indication that the camera used has not yet been announced.

A picture from the Leica S2 maybe.
Actually Mr. Reichmann wrote already an article about the S2: "Pick any two"

I was thinking the same a while ago, that most of the images, were shot with a S2 and because Leica still has some NDA going, but well we will know sooner or later.