QUOTE (John R @ Oct 11 2009, 11:27 PM)

There appears to be a general tendency to underexpose the photos. Almost all of them can be brightened up a bit. Except the tower, which appears to be overexposed. Some are a little soft, perhaps because your son was not using a tripod? On the whole, they are well composed and he does show a sense of visual design which is a good start.
JMR
John - I mentioned the darkness of the shots to him - I have been telling him about ETTR - may partly be his monitor on the family PC - I will plan on calibrating it using my eye-one, see if that may help. And he does have a tripod, uses it religiously, but it is a somewhat thin Velbon that my wife got me as a gift years ago that has been passed down. Perhaps a new carbon-fibre unit is due, so that he upgrades to a slightly worn, Manfrotto 055

.
QUOTE (RSL @ Oct 12 2009, 02:07 PM)

Andrew, This kid could be another Jacques-Henri Lartigue. If he composed these shots on his own he's got a really good eye. The duck on the water is more than just a good shot. The way he caught the sun just brushing the background with its fall leaves, and the mist on the water, are elements a lot of photographers just wouldn't have been able to grab. The composition of that shot is excellent -- with a heavy anchor on the left and another on the right, with the main thrust between. As everyone noted, some of the shots are a bit underexposed (not the duck), but that's easy to fix. I don't agree with John that the tower's overexposed, but it's hard to judge on a computer monitor. In any case, he's done very, very good work with his camera.
Russ - he composed these shots all by himself, maybe just a little help on the island which has the loon in the picture. I try to help him with the technical aspects/composition but mostly offline (e.g., back at home, or in between shots while we talk) but pretty much leave him to his own devices when the shutters fly.
Thanks for the comments - he's beaming.
Andrew