dbarthel
Nov 22 2003, 10:06 AM
Forgot to mention that I view this as a fine art camera with a 36x36 sensor at about 16megapixels. Kind of a 1Ds on steriods.
boku
Nov 24 2003, 07:54 AM
I also had these thoughts. I took it a step further...
While the sensor could be square, it could also be "cross shaped". You could take 43mm diagonal shots in the vertical or horizontal orientation without rotating the camera. The image would be saved in an efficient H or V orientation so only the sensor need have more pixels. Same 35mm lenses, same memory requirements as a full-frame DSLR, but no more rotation of the body. Sort of like a "digitally rotating back". The manufacturer could optimize the ergonomics of this form factor.
dbarthel
Nov 22 2003, 08:37 AM
Since film size is not an issue, and an image circle is a circle, why not expand chip size to square? More pixels, better cropping possibilities, etc. come to mind. Kind of like Michaels Kodak back on his 6x45, all the things he likes would be available to smaller format users at a lot less $$. Granted, the body shape would change somewhat, but our investment in glass would be safe.
BJL
Nov 22 2003, 11:18 AM
The sensor size that can be used with existing 35mm lenses is limited by the diameter of the image circle, so for shorter focal lengths at least, you cannot exceed the 43mm of 35mm format, and indeed a little less seems advisable, to deal with slight weakness in the corners that is sometimes revealed by high quality digital sensors.
So you would be limited to 30x30mm. That means that the break even point for getting a larger image compared to a 24x36 sensor would be 24x30, or 5:4 shape. The square camera image would be bigger for shapes form square to 5:4, but smaller for anything from 5:4 through 3:2 and wider. Since the great majority of even fine art prints are in the shape range from 5:4 up, most photographers would more often lose usable image are rather than gaining.
This is before allowing for the fact that the greater frame depth of 30mm (or 36mm) would considerably increase the depth of the mirror and the size of the prism if one stays with the standard SLR approach. Thus it would require a major redesign and up-sizing, and might not even be compatable with current 35mm lenses, since they might need to be mounted further from the focal plane in order to make room for the bigger mirror.
By the time all the necessary changes are made, the camera ends up looking a lot like a 645 medium format digital system.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.