RichardM
Feb 6 2004, 10:21 PM
I asked Thom Hogan this question (great Nikon site by the way at www.bythom.com) and he told me that the timers on the Nikon digital bodies don't work this way.
So no mirror lock-up nor mirror pre-fire with the D70.
Richard
Dale_Cotton
Feb 7 2004, 12:40 PM
MLU is certainly necessary for certain lenses, but for vibration supression - at least on the range of focal lengths that I use (28 to 300) - I am doing fine without it with my F80. I was quite concerned about this when I got my F80, but found no difference in image quality between my shots with my F2 using MLU, and my F80 without MLU, except at the well-known window around 1/15th sec. Yes, it can be a bit of a pain avoiding that window, but that's made up by not having to deal with MLU.
Apparently, the mirror and shutter on the F80, F100, D100, etc. are very well damped. The shutter release sound is certainly very muted compared to the F2.
Pete
Feb 8 2004, 08:03 PM
Richard,
One of the tips given at Nikon school for lack of mirror lockup is really simple. Hold a piece of cardboard or a piece of paper in front of the lens for a moment until the vibration stops, This, I believe, would be used with a bulb setting, but should be okay for most applications.
Nikon school is pretty good about a number of SIMPLE solutions to many problems. A worthwhile day for any photo enthusiast.
Pete
RichardM
Feb 5 2004, 09:38 PM
From what I have read at a number of sources, there appears to be no mirror lock-up on the D70, which I consider to be a problem for some of the shooting that I do.
The work around that I am using currently with my film-based Nikon, is to engage the timer for 2 seconds or so, as the mirror flips up instantly, yet the shutter doesn't fire until the time is up. Does this work the same way with the digital bodies?
If this is the case, I will no longer be worried about not having a dedicated mirror lock-up function.
Richard
MatthewCromer
Feb 6 2004, 10:37 PM
Maybe at some point someone will explain to me the brain-dead idiocy that leads a camera company to release an otherwise excellent camera that is lacking this key feature.
This is worse than the encrypted RAW files on the Sony 828 (which have now been hacked).
Shame!
Erik M
Feb 8 2004, 06:46 PM
Dale,
Would you say that if using a Nikon VR lens the lack of MLU wouldn't really be a problem at all?
Erik
RichardM
Feb 8 2004, 09:46 PM
Thanks for the tip Pete,
I must admit that I have never thought of that. I'll give it a try sometime.
Richard
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.