By Charles Sidney Johnson, Jr.
Questions like this and misleading answers fill the photographic forums. One “expert” says that lenses are not equivalent to anything else, and another claims that a big sensor is necessary to get a small depth-of-field. These are at best half-truths. So what is correct?
It is easier to understand the important points by considering what is necessary to obtain an “equivalent” or identical image with different camera/sensor sizes. In order to obtain an equivalent imageallof the following properties must be the same:
Angle of view (field of view).
Perspective
Depth-of-field (DoF)
Diffraction broadening
Shutter speed/exposure
According to this definition, two equivalent images will appear to be the same in all aspects; and the observer will not be able to detect any evidence of the size camera/sensor that was used. This still leaves “noise,” pixel count, and lens quality to be considered later. The starting point is to recognize that typical cameras have ...
By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: The Luminous Landscape Inc. https://luminous-landscape.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.
Read this story and all the best stories on The Luminous Landscape
The author has made this story available to Luminous Landscape members only. Upgrade to get instant access to this story and other benefits available only to members.
Why choose us?
Luminous-Landscape is a membership site. Our website contains over 5300 articles on almost every topic, camera, lens and printer you can imagine. Our membership model is simple, a Dollar-a-Month ($12.00 USD a year). This $12 gains you access to a wealth of information including all our past and future video tutorials on such topics as Lightroom, Capture One, Printing, file management and dozens of interviews and travel videos.
New Articles every few days
All original content found nowhere else on the web
No Pop Up Google Sense ads – Our advertisers are photo related
Download/stream video to any device
NEW videos monthly
Top well-known photographer contributors
Posts from industry leaders
Speciality Photography Workshops
Mobile device scalable
Exclusive video interviews
Special vendor offers for members
Hands On Product reviews
FREE – User Forum. One of the most read user forums on the internet
Access to our community Buy and Sell pages; for members only.
Charles S. Johnson, Jr. received a Ph.D. in Physical Chemistry from MIT. He taught at the University of Illinois at Urbana, Yale University, and The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where he is now Professor Emeritus. He has published approximately 150 papers on magnetic resonance and light scattering as well as books on laser light scattering and quantum mechanics.
His interest in photography goes back to the 1950's; however, for many years his career in science left little time for serious photography. Now he is an avid nature photographer, and he blogs about photography here. In addition, he is making use of his scientific background to research and write about the physical and psychological bases of photography. His recent book, Science for the Curious Photographer, 2nd Ed, includes discussions of light and optics, sensors, factors that determine image quality, and the human visual system.
Be in the Know: Get the Exclusive LuLa Newsletter Sent to Your Inbox!
Get access to exclusive articles, behind-the-scenes content, and become a valued member of our photography team! Subscribe now to elevate your photography experience.