Epson 1270 / 870

August 27, 2012 ·

Michael Reichmann

Epson 1270 /870

This subject will be featured in a forthcoming issue of The Luminous Landscape Video Journal.


March, 2001:The Epson 1270 has been replaced by theEpson 1280 / 1290models. An updated review is now availablehere.

The Wait

In early April 2000, Epson Canada released the870and1270printers in this country. What follows are my initial impressions of this latest generation photo printer from Epson. These printers were first available in Asia in January, then in Europe during early February, and finally the U.S. in mid-March. Because of the staggered release and the ubiquity of information on the Net there has been a lot of frustrated waiting among photographers in the U.S. and Canada. The wait is now over.

This is Epson’s fourth generation photo printer. Every spring Epson releases a new model. First there was theStylus Photo, then theEX, then the1200and now the1270. (The 870 is essentially the same printer, but limited to 8X10″ prints. Just about everything I say about the 1270 applies equally to the 870.)

I have purchased and used each one of these (as well as the oddHP,CanonandAlpsphoto printer) and can state authoritatively that the 1270 is the finest photo printer to date. You’re not surprised are you?

What I can also say, after some 35 years as a photographer, printer and teacher, is that the Epson 1270 along with its new inks and papers is the first inkjet printer that can claim to supplant traditional wet process photographic printing!Let’s see why.

Boulders & Palm Shadows #2, January 2000

The Good, The Bad & The Ugly

If you already have an earlier generation Epson Photo printer superficially there isn’t much different about the 1270. USB, serial and parallel connections are standard, and the printer works equally well with either PC or Mac platforms. What is new and of greatest significance are the inks and papers. As most everyone knows these are the first OEM inks and papers that are archival, approaching and even exceeding the longevity of traditional wet-process colour media.(Heavyweight Matt Paperon an 870/1270 is rated byWilhelm Researchas having a 25 year life span, while the gold standard for more than a quarter century,Cibachrome / Ilfochrome is rated at 27 years â�¹ essentially identical).

My first impression though was one of frustration . I was one of a thousand or so people that received a 1270 with an 870 CD ROM installation disk in error. Thinking that this was a generic install disk designed for both printers I proceeded to waste a great deal of time and effort. After an hour on the phone with a knowledgeable and helpful customer support technician at Epson Canada I was able to download the proper drivers (9MB) and get the printer up and running successfully. If you’re buying a 1270 in the U.S. or Canada during the spring of 2000 check the box before you leave the store . It’ll save you a lot of grief.

Since these printers all came in a single batch from one factory Epson clearly has to know their serial numbers. Why they can’t do a recall or notify dealers is beyond me. I wasted hours on this and did considerable damage to my printer driver directory because of this problem. Mistakes happen, but Epson could and should do better in remedying this one.

Also, on the topic of Epson, I’m informed by my dealer in Toronto that it will be up to 2 months (June?) until the new papers are available in Canada in large sizes. Unbelievable. What’s up Epson?

Update: April, 2000

To Epson’s credit they sent the correct 1270 CD by courier and it arrived the next day.

First Impressions

Silence. The 1270 compared to the 1200 and previousStylus Photoprinters is much �muchquieter. Cosmetically the printer is more rounded than the 1200 and features a clear gray-smoked plastic cover. These changes are small and incremental, but show that Epson is focusing primarily on image quality rather than cosmetic changes just for the sake of change.

Blue Pool Reflection, Arches N.P. � 2000

The Test

What ultimately counts is, what do prints look like? I decided to compare output with my 1200 printer, which remained attached to my computer. SincePictorico Hi-Gloss White Filmhas been my paper of choice during 1999 I first made a print using this paper and compared it to a print on the same paper from the 1200.

Astonishingly, the 1270 was better. Why do I say “astonishingly”? Because my system is completely calibrated, from monitor to scanner to printer to paper. What I see on my screen is essentially what I get on paper. To my amazement the first 1270 print on Pictorico paper was essentially perfect â�¹ in fact the colour balance was slightly more neutral than with my fully calibrated 1200! Given that the 1200 / Pictorico combination uses a custom profile and the 1270 was done simply using its generic settings for “Glossy Film”, needless to say I was very pleased with this initial test.

The Papers

The biggest news about the 870/1270 printers is that not only do they offer the highest image quality yet, but there are now inks and papers with archival characteristics comparable to traditional wet-process photographic media. In particular, Epson’sHeavyweight Matt Paperis rated as having a 25 year rating for fade resistance byWilhelm Researchâ�¹ the highest rating for any OEM ink and paper combination, and almost the equal of traditional processes such asIlfochrome / Cibachrome. This means that for the first time ink jet output can be sold as fine art prints, with the confidence that under normal display conditions there is no compromise over traditional media.

The printer ships with samples of both the new matt paper and also Epson’s newPremium Glossy Photo Paper. I had heard very good things about this paper and was eager to compare it toPictorico Hi-Gloss, my previous gold standard for image quality.

3 Pelicans, Salton Sea, 2000

The Comparison

There are a lot of variables to compare. The first thing to note is that inks and papers are now almost inseparably linked. One just can’t talk about image quality and archival permanence without noting both the paper and the ink used. It’s also important to note that the ink cartridges for the 870/1270 printers from Epson (and likely all future Epson printers) now have micro-chips incorporated. No cartridge without such a chip can be used in these printers, and so it appears that third-party ink carts are probably a thing of the past.

Having said all this, I made the following prints, using an image that has clean whites and neutral tones, as well as a lot of fine detail.

The Reference Print:

Epson 1200 with Pictorico Hi-Gloss White Film and Epson ink

Sharp, glossy, pure whites, clean colours � my standard to date

The Comparison Prints:

Epson 1270 with Pictorico Hi-Gloss White Film and Epson ink

Excellent. Very similar to the 1200 print, but with slightly more neutral colour balance (!)

Epson 1270 with Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper and Epson Ink

Similar to Pictorico Hi-Gloss or Glossy Film on the 1270. Not quite as white or bright as Pictorico. Almost certainly better archival characteristics than Pictorico paper with Epson ink, but otherwise not preferable visually. Because if its archival characteristics though I’ll likely switch from  Pictorico to Epson Premium. Pictorico has the look and feel of a Cibachrome print, Epson Premium Glossy of a very good Type C print.

Epson 1270 with Epson Heavyweight Matt Paper and Epson InkThis was a shocker since I normally prefer glossy paper.
I’ve been a Cibachrome printer for more than 25 years and always was partial to their glossy paper.
For the first time I’ve found a matt paper that I like; that I really like.
This paper losses nothing in terms of colour saturation or detail, and because
of its matt finish is ideal for display prints.

Though I still have more tests to do, my initial opinion is that I will switch toHeavyweight Matt Paperfor display prints and keep usingPictorico Hi-Glossfor portfolio prints. In fact, once I have done some fade tests of my own I’m likely to stop havingLightJet 5000prints made for display and will switch completely to inkjet prints on this paper for all applications. The combination of the 1270 printer andHeavyweight Mattpaper isthatimpressive.

A Note Regarding Colour Shift

Prints on matt paper come out of the printer essentially with their final colours. But, on Pictorico Hi-Gloss and on Epson Premium Glossy the image is about 10-15cc too magenta when it first comes out of the printer. Full stabilization seems to take about 10 minutes. Curiously, this is the same effect that one used to get when developing Cibachrome material. It may have something to do with initial oxidation of the dyes. Consequently, don’t judge fine colour balance until the print has had time to assume its final colours.

Printing Black & White

For the past year (prior to the 1270) I have used the the olderPhoto EXwith MIS inks for monochrome printing. My article entitledDigital B&W Printingdiscusses this in detail. I have now switched to using the 1270 printer with colour inks andHeavyweight Matt Paperfor monochrome work. These prints are excellent, offering archival permanence and excellent monochrome characteristics. It should be said of course that archivally processed silver prints on non-RC paper have the greatest archival permanence.

I’ve found that the 1270 printer produces monochrome prints with essentially no colour cast. OnHeavyweight Matt Paper,through a 4X loupe, they are virtually indistinguishable from a traditional silver print on matt paper. To the naked eye, completely so.

The method of printing is simplicity itself. Simply convert the image from RGB colour to Grayscale, if it isn’t so already. Then go toPage Setup / Properties / Advanced,selectColor Controlsand setGammato2.2. Be sure that you print with the color inks, not in B&W mode. You may also want to increase contrast by 5-10%, but you’ll want to experiment with different brightness and contrast settings for each image in any event.

Additional Resources

Digital Photography Reviewhas a very goodwrite-upon these new printers, andIan Lyonspreliminary reviewalso has some highly useful information.

A commentary byAlain Briot� a photographer who makes his living from selling fine-art photographic prints � is reproducedhere, and you can also reada commentaryon using the 1270 in a Mac environment by photographer and Mac expert,Kip Peterson.

Be Aware

As mentioned above, and elsewhere, the new inks and papers work as a combination to achieve their archival characteristics. You can use the new papers with earlier Epson printers, but you can not use the new inks in any other printer. This means that the new papers when used with older printers will not give archival permanence. You’ll need to explore some of the third-party pigment-based inks for this.

Also, Epson has made it clear that they will not be releasing the new inks for use with older printers. This requires the new heads and electronics of the 870/1270 and later models. If you want the archival permanence of Epson’s latest papers and inks you need the new printers, and remember â�¹ theHeavyweight Matt Paperis considerably longer lasting (3X) thanPremium Glossy.

NB:The photographs on this page are not related to the printer test and are here strictly for graphic display purposes.

Epson 7000 Printers

Ok. The Epson 1270 and it’s semi-archival inks and papers are great. So what’s next? Have a look atthis pagefor a sneak preview.

Super Archival Epson 2000P Printer

As if the pace isn’t fast enough, in late May, 2000 Epson announced a pigment-based photographic printer with inks and papers rated at up to 200 years. Afull reviewis now online. It should be noted though that this printer costs double what a 1270 will cost you and produces prints that are essentially visually identical. The only thing you gain is increased print longevity â�¹ from 20-30 years to 100-200 years, depending on the paper used.

Epson – The Next Generation

The year 2000 is turning out to be a banner year for Epson photo printers. No sooner did the 870/1270 start shipping than they announced 3 new archival photo printers.Here’swhat known as of early June, 2000.

Premature Fading Reports

In June, 2000 there were extensive reports on various discussion boards about very premature fading of prints made on 870 and 1270 printers usingEpson Premium Glossy Photo Paper. According toWilhelm Researchthis is as a results of deterioration of the cyan inks due to a particular sensitivity of this paper to ozone and other airborne contaminants. Further details can be found on theWilhelm site.


The following is a message posted to an Epson printer mail-list on July 26, 2000. I have no additional information, but if your interested you should follow up on your own.

Message: 23
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:37:20 -0700
From: Jo Ann Snover <>
Subject: Epson offered paper or printer refund for 1270

I called Epson Customer Service and they will refund my paper costs forthe Premium Glossy Photo paper wasted by orange fading. They gave me their UPS account number to ship them back the boxes and any spoiled samples I have at no charge to me. They will also send me a refund for the printer if I want to return it.  

I read the review of the 2000P atLuminous Landscape, and I’m not really sure that I want to make the trade. Of course what I’d really like is a 1270 that worked as advertised 🙂 The woman I spoke with had no information about whether or when there would be upgraded inks or paper that don’t have the gas fade problems. I didn’t get any grief from them – they knew all about the problem. She did suggest that I could use plastic sleeves for 4×6 prints – I said it’s not a practical (or cheap) solution to sending pictures to family in plastic sleeves.

If anyone else wants to call, it was 562-276 1311 (fax # is 562 2905536).

Jo Ann

For what it’s worth I have not seen the problem of premature fading and discoloration myself. Neither has landscape photographerAlain Briotwho I communicate with regularly on these topics and who also makes a large number of 1270 prints for his clients. Alain lives in hot and dry rural Arizona while I live in cool, humid urban Toronto, Ontario.Ian Lyons, author of a number of articles on the 1270, who lives in Ireland (yet another climate) has not seen this problem either. Go figure.

Update: July 30, 2000

The controversy over the orange fading problem continues. There is nowa new sitedevoted exclusively to this issue. It seems to be taking quite a hard-nosed position but until Epson takes a public and definitive stand on this issue I suppose this is justified.

Update: August 16, 2000

Network World Magazine, a highly respected U.K. journal has just published an online column byMark Gibbswhich roundly chastises Epson for their position on the orange fade problem. He specifically is critical that while they have done the right thing by offering dissatisfied customers a refund, they are allowing other customers who may be unaware of the refund to remain in the dark.

Update: August 22, 2000

In a recent conversation with an informedEpsonrepresentative I’ve been told that in North America they have now proactively contacted every person they could who has complained about the orange fade problem, either on-line or directly to Epson. All of these folks have been offered refunds, but interestingly, as of mid-August no one has taken them up on their offer!

As we know, the problem is centered aroundPremium Glossy Photo Paperand is caused by high ozone levels, and therefore is only seen in some locations. I’ve never seen it, and neither have any of the many photographers that I’m in frequent contact with. It exists, but it’s rare.

In any event, there have been rumours that this paper is going to be reformulated to reduce if not eliminate the problem. I’d guess that these rumours have merit. In the meantime try some of the other great papers that are on the market such asMatt Heavyweight, and my favourite, the newArchival Mattintroduced for the 2000P but which works wonderfully on the 1270 as well.

Update: September 9, 2000

Bruce Frazer, a journalist, book author and one of the industry’s leading experts on colour calibration has published anopen letterto Epson inMacWEEK.comregarding the orange fade problem with the 1270 printer.

Using The 2000P New Archival Papers

With the introduction of theEpson 2000Pprinter and its archival inks came several new papers. Two of these,Archival MattandPremium Semigloss,will be of particular interest to 870 and 1270 owners.

TheArchival Mattis almost identical toHeavyweight Mattexcept that it is on slightly heavier stock. Otherwise it prints identically. If you’ve been annoyed by some waviness when printing images with large dark areas on theHeavyweight Mattthen the newArchival Mattwill be appreciated.

ThePremium Semiglossis a very appealing new paper and if you haven’t already done so you shouldread about itin my 2000P review. It has a weight and texture that’s very appealing. It prints very nicely on the 1270 with the paper setting adjusted toGlossy Film. It’s worth noting that since the green cast problem of the 2000P is associated with the inks, not the papers, it is not an issue onPremium Semiglossfor 1270 owners.

Update: September 29, 2000

Byte.comhas an article byDavid Emon the latest regarding theorange fadeproblem. You can read ithere.

Update: November 7, 2000

Byte.comhas another excellent article byDavid Emon Epson’s latest generation of printers, papers and inks, and the problems that they’re having. You can read ithere.

Update: March 12, 2001

The Epson 1270 has been replaced by the Epson 1280 / 1290 models. An updated review is now availablehere.

This subject will be featured in a forthcoming issue of The Luminous Landscape Video Journal.

Avatar photo

Michael Reichmann is the founder of the Luminous Landscape. Michael passed away in May 2016. Since its inception in 1999 LuLa has become the world's largest site devoted to the art, craft, and technology of photography. Each month more than one million people from every country on the globe visit LuLa.

You May Also Enjoy...

Camera & Technology

PhotoCard By Bill Atkinson – A Great App For Sharing Special Events

January 10, 2018 ·

Kevin Raber

FacebookTweet PhotoCard by Bill Atkinson – Overview I’m all about the print.  I’m also all about travel, and I do a lot of it.  So,

Canon 24-105-vs-28-135

March 22, 2011 ·

Mark Segal

Please note that the JPG files below, once reduced in size and compressed for the web, do not show as great a difference as Mark