Share article:
Share article:

A Tale of Two Extenders

While some nature photographers swear by them, others swear at them. What is the object of their attention? 2X Extenders. Most photographers find that camera manufacturer’s 1.4X Extenders produce quite decent quality, especially when the lens is stopped down a bit. But with 2X Extenders there is less unanimity.

In my experience 2X Extenders range from awful to just "OK". Few photographers that I know would say that they’re everwonderful. But, there are shooting situations where the need to get tighter outweighs the need for optimum image quality, so most photographers have one in their kit.

The Lure of The New

In 2001 Canon updated both their EF 1.4X and 2X Extenders. Both now have the designationIIafter their model numbers. In both cases Canon added rubber weather sealing on the mount, designed to mate with the seals on their then new line ofImage Stabilizedsuper-telephoto lenses. They claim to have added new anti-reflection coating to both units, but also to have completely redesigned the 2X. Canon therefore claims that the 2X gives better performance than the previous generation. Naturally, I had to see this for myself.

The Test

For this test I decided to use my highest quality long lens, theCanon 300mm f/2.8L IS. This lens is capable of superb performance, even wide-open. It was mounted on a large rigid tripod,ISwas turned ON, and I ran a series of frames usingFuji Provia 100Fwith anEOS 1V. Scans were done using anImacon Flextight Photoscanner at 3200 PPI.

The red building is theCBCbroadcasting building in downtown Toronto. A nice high-contrast subject on a sunny day.

300mm

300mm + 2X Extender

Wide Open @ F/5.6

The two frames above show the field of view with the 300mm lens by itself, and then with a 2X Extender. The four frames immediately below show a 100% cropped section of both the center and the upper right-hand corner of the frames. These were done first with the old 2X Extender and then with the new one.

Center Frame‚ 300mm + Old 2X Extender @ f/5.6

Corner‚ 300mm + Old 2X Extender @ f/5.6

Center Frame‚ 300mm + New 2X Extender @ f/5.6

Corner‚ 300mm + New 2X Extender @ f/5.6

There is not a big difference between the old and the new Extenders with the lens wide open, though the new 2X is indeedslightlysharper at this aperture.  

You’ll notice a bluish haze over part of the new extender’s center frame shot. This is from the steam rising from the ventilation tower just to left of the satellite dish. Unfortunately I hadn’t noticed that the wind had blown some into the frame for this shot. I don’t believe that it materially effects the results.

Closed Down 2 Stops @ f/11

The series below was done with the aperture closed down 2 stops from wide open, to f/11. There’s an obvious improvement in image quality with both Extenders, both at the center and the corners. But I still don’t see a huge difference between the old and new 2X Extender except in the corner, where the new 2X is somewhat sharper. Curiously, the old 2X looks a bit sharper in the center examples.

Center Frame‚ 300mm + Old 2X Extender @ f/11

Corner‚ 300mm + Old 2X Extender @ f/11

Center Frame‚ 300mm + New 2X Extender @ f/11

Corner‚ 300mm + New 2X Extender @ f/11

Conclusion

I was ambivalent about how I wanted this test to turn out. On the one hand I would have liked very much for the new Canon 2X Extender to surpass the old one, as I’ve never felt that the quality I got from my Canon 2X was as good as I wanted or needed. On the other hand I knew that if the new model showed a marked improvement I’d want to get one, making a fresh dent in my wallet.

I have to admit that I was disappointed when I saw the results. It would therefore appear that my desire for a better 2X Extender exceeded my desire to contain my equipment spending.

If you have a Canon system and think you need, or at leastwanta 2X Extender, then the new model is about as good as it gets. If, as I do, you already own the previous generation then I wouldn’t be in a rush to replace it.

Read this story and all the best stories on The Luminous Landscape

The author has made this story available to Luminous Landscape members only. Upgrade to get instant access to this story and other benefits available only to members.

Why choose us?

Luminous-Landscape is a membership site. Our website contains over 5300 articles on almost every topic, camera, lens and printer you can imagine. Our membership model is simple, just $2 a month ($24.00 USD a year). This $24 gains you access to a wealth of information including all our past and future video tutorials on such topics as Lightroom, Capture One, Printing, file management and dozens of interviews and travel videos.

  • New Articles every few days
  • All original content found nowhere else on the web
  • No Pop Up Google Sense ads – Our advertisers are photo related
  • Download/stream video to any device
  • NEW videos monthly
  • Top well-known photographer contributors
  • Posts from industry leaders
  • Speciality Photography Workshops
  • Mobile device scalable
  • Exclusive video interviews
  • Special vendor offers for members
  • Hands On Product reviews
  • FREE – User Forum. One of the most read user forums on the internet
  • Access to our community Buy and Sell pages; for members only.
Share article:
Michael Reichmann is the founder of the Luminous Landscape. Michael passed away in May 2016. Since its inception in 1999 LuLa has become the world's largest site devoted to the art, craft, and technology of photography. Each month more than one million people from every country on the globe visit LuLa.
See all articles by this author

You may also like

DSCF DxO
Camera & Technology

The GFX lens line (or the parts of it that I’ve personally experienced)

FacebookTweet As I wrote the reviews of the GFX 100SII and the 500mm f5.6, I realized that I’ve now used enough of the GFX lens...
Dan Wells

Dan Wells

·

September 6, 2025

·

10 minutes read


image
Photographer Profiles

Why I Print Every Travel Story

Why I print every travel story instead of leaving it on a hard drive.
Michael Durr

Michael Durr

·

September 5, 2025

·

8 minutes read